Reaction #4131575
Related Literature (1)
openreactiondata ↗doi:10.1039/C8SC04228D
Conditions: temp:0.00; pressure:0.00; stir:
Source ID: ord-075472dfd2c44edf8910b2601205e4a5No renderable structure data available
CC1=C(C=CC(=C1C)O)OChemical Intermediate
Structures, identifiers and computed properties have been matched to the database record by CAS.
| Intermediates | 2,3-dimethylbenzene-1,4-diol |
|---|---|
| IUPAC Name | — |
| CAS Number | 608-43-5 |
| Database ID | 69100 |
| Molecular Formula | — |
| Molecular Weight | — |
Product Information
2,3-dimethylbenzene-1,4-diol (CAS 608-43-5) product identity, structure identifiers and related reaction data for chemical intermediate research and sourcing review.
Potential Applications
For professional research and industrial use only
Database ID 69100
Safety Notice
For professional research and industrial use only. Review the supplier safety data sheet before handling.
Synthesis data
12 reactions · 12 references
Conditions: temp:0.00; pressure:0.00; stir:
Source ID: ord-075472dfd2c44edf8910b2601205e4a5Conditions: temp:0.00; pressure:0.00; stir:
Source ID: ord-fd0216fe2f0948e680058a1c872f2c50Conditions: temp:0.00; pressure:0.00; stir:
Source ID: ord-8b6d5c309aa049ceaed11abdfdb78fb3Conditions: temp:0.00; pressure:0.00; stir:; See reaction.notes.procedure_details.
Procedure: Into an autoclave (inner volume: 4.5 ml, made of SUS 316, without manometer) were charged 0.016 g of hydroquinone, 1.355 g of methanol and 2.5 mg of calcium oxide (manufactured by Wako Pure Chemical Ind., Ltd.). The reaction was started by elevating the temperature up to425° C. with sand bath. After 8 minutes, the autoclave was quickly cooled and the reaction solution was taken out from the autoclave when the temperature was cooled back to the room temperature. The measurement according to the process described above revealed that the conversion of hydroquinone was 87% by mole, the selectivity of monomethylhydroquinone was 30% by mole, the selectivity of dimethylhydroquinone was 42% by mole and the selectivity of trimethylhydroquinone was 18% by mole. As byproducts, tetramethylhydroquinone was produced with a selectivity of 3% by mole. the autoclave was quickly cooled
Source ID: ord-e5892577487542c3aee56a62eb3928f9Conditions: temp:0.00; pressure:0.00; stir:; See reaction.notes.procedure_details.
Procedure: Into an autoclave (inner volume: 4.5 ml, made of SUS 316, without manometer) were charged 0.031 g of hydroquinone, 1.370 g of methanol and 0.063 mg of lithium hydroxide monohydrate (manufactured by Wako Pure Chemical Ind., Ltd.). The reaction was started by elevating the temperature up to 420° C. with sand bath. After 7 minutes, the autoclave was quickly cooled and the reaction solution was taken out from the autoclave when the temperature was cooled back to the room temperature. The measurement according to the process described above revealed that the conversion of hydroquinone was 72% by mole, the selectivity of monomethylhydroquinone was 34% by mole, the selectivity of dimethylhydroquinone was 42% by mole and the selectivity of trimethylhydroquinone was 18% by mole. As byproducts, tetramethylhydroquinone and p-methoxyphenol were produced with selectivities of 2% by mole and 1% by mole, respectively. up to 420° C. the autoclave was quickly cooled
Source ID: ord-1f60ddf478334f48af70da27ac33a8d0Conditions: temp:0.00; pressure:0.00; stir:; See reaction.notes.procedure_details.
Procedure: Into an autoclave (inner volume: 9 ml, made of SUS 316, equipped with a manometer) were charged 0.098 g of methylhydroquinone, 3.491 g of methanol and 7 mg of lanthanum oxide (manufactured by High Purity Chemicals Co.). The reaction was started by elevating the temperature up to 350° C. with sand bath. The pressure during the reaction was 18 MPa. After 2 hours, the autoclave was quickly cooled and the reaction solution was taken out from the autoclave when the temperature was cooled back to the room temperature. The measurement according to the process described above revealed that the conversion of methylhydroquinone was 32% by mole, the selectivity of dimethylhydroquinone was 80% by mole, the selectivity of trimethylhydroquinone was 10% by mole and no tetramethylhydroquinone was produced. equipped with a manometer) up to 350° C. the autoclave was quickly cooled
Source ID: ord-67e836e63e8a45298e2acbd8917caeefConditions: temp:0.00; pressure:0.00; stir:; See reaction.notes.procedure_details.
Procedure: Into an autoclave (inner volume: 9 ml, made of SUS 316, equipped with a manometer) were charged 0.092 g of methylhydroquinone, 3.895 g of methanol and 7.2 mg of zinc powders (manufactured by High Purity Chemicals Co.). The reaction was started by elevating the temperature up to 350° C. with sand bath. The pressure during the reaction was 17 MPa. After 2 hours, the autoclave was quickly cooled and the reaction solution was taken out from the autoclave when the temperature was cooled back to the room temperature. The measurement according to the process described above revealed that the conversion of methylhydroquinone was 23% by mole, the selectivity of dimethylhydroquinone was 92% by mole, the selectivity of trimethylhydroquinone was 8% by mole and no tetramethylhydroquinone was produced. equipped with a manometer) up to 350° C. the autoclave was quickly cooled
Source ID: ord-2e8d7521a058424daad922cc8427032bConditions: temp:0.00; pressure:0.00; stir:; See reaction.notes.procedure_details.
Procedure: Into an autoclave (inner volume: 9 ml, made of SUS 316, equipped with a manometer) were charged 0.115 g of methylhydroquinone, 3.268 g of methanol and 4.6 mg of chromium oxide (manufactured by High Purity Chemicals). The reaction was started by elevating the temperature up to 350° C. with sand bath. The pressure during the reaction was 18 MPa. After 2 hours, the autoclave was quickly cooled and the reaction solution was taken out from the autoclave when the temperature was cooled back to the room temperature. The measurement according to the process described above revealed that the conversion of methylhydroquinone was 17% by mole, the selectivity of dimethylhydroquinone was 74% by mole and the selectivity of trimethylhydroquinone was 2% by mole. No tetramethylhydroquinone was produced. equipped with a manometer) up to 350° C. the autoclave was quickly cooled
Source ID: ord-e89f99fbd2f24f859f6b97f987213038Conditions: temp:0.00; pressure:0.00; stir:; See reaction.notes.procedure_details.
Procedure: Into an autoclave (inner volume: 9 ml, made of SUS 316, equipped with a manometer) were charged 0.104 g of methylhydroquinone, 3.4078 g of methanol and 8.3 mg of iron powders (manufactured by Wako Pure Chemical Ind., Ltd.). The reaction was started by elevating the temperature up to 350° C. with sand bath. The pressure during the reaction was 20 MPa. After 2 hours, the autoclave was quickly cooled and the reaction solution was taken out from the autoclave when the temperature was cooled back to the room temperature. The measurement according to the process described above revealed that the conversion of methylhydroquinone was 16% by mole, the selectivity of dimethylhydroquinone was 82% by mole and the selectivity of trimethylhydroquinone was 3% by mole. No tetramethylhydroquinone was produced. equipped with a manometer) up to 350° C. the autoclave was quickly cooled
Source ID: ord-af2687bb1220432cb1ed01fbda9f5006Conditions: temp:0.00; pressure:0.00; stir:; See reaction.notes.procedure_details.
Procedure: Into an autoclave (inner volume: 9 ml, made of SUS 316, equipped with a manometer) were charged 0.105 g of hydroquinone (manufactured by Wako Pure Chemical Ind., Ltd.), 3.602 g of methanol and 1.3 mg of manganese dioxide (manufactured by High Purity Chemicals Co.). The reaction was started by elevating the temperature up to 350° C. with sand bath. The pressure during the reaction was 15 MPa. After 8 hours, the autoclave was quickly cooled and the reaction solution was taken out from the autoclave when the temperature was cooled back to the room temperature. The measurement according to the process described above revealed that the conversion of hydroquinone was 41% by mole, the selectivity of monomethylhydroquinone was 43% by mole, the selectivity of dimethylhydroquinone was 13% by mole and the selectivity of trimethylhydroquinone was 1% by mole. No tetramethylhydroquinone was produced. equipped with a manometer) up to 350° C. the autoclave was quickly cooled
Source ID: ord-5abd543ba6784fc094a7622f13858cfeConditions: temp:0.00; pressure:0.00; stir:; See reaction.notes.procedure_details.
Procedure: Into an autoclave (inner volume: 9 ml, made of SUS 316, equipped with a manometer) were charged 0.111 g of methylhydroquinone, 3.463 g of methanol and 4.6 mg of manganese dioxide (manufactured by High Purity Chemicals Co.). The reaction was started by elevating the temperature up to 350° C. with sand bath. The pressure during the reaction was 16 MPa. After 2 hours, the autoclave was quickly cooled and the reaction solution was taken out from the autoclave when the temperature was cooled back to the room temperature. The measurement according to the process described above revealed that the conversion of methylhydroquinone was 45% by mole, the selectivity of dimethylhydroquinone was 64% by mole, the selectivity of trimethylhydroquinone was 17% by mole and no tetramethylhydroquinone was produced. As byproducts, methyl ethers of dimethylquinone and trimethylquinone, represented by the formulae shown above, were formed with a selectivity of 6% and 2%, respectively. equipped with a manometer) up to 350° C. the autoclave was quickly cooled
Source ID: ord-533eb576f3e7470292d5e0346157de96Conditions: temp:0.00; pressure:0.00; stir:; See reaction.notes.procedure_details.
Procedure: Into an autoclave (inner volume: 9 ml, made of SUS 316, equipped with a manometer) were charged 0.108 g of methylhydroquinone, 3.573 g of methanol and 0.2 mg of sodium methylate. The reaction was started by elevating the temperature up to 350° C. with sand bath. The pressure during the reaction was 16 MPa. After 4 hours, the autoclave was quickly cooled and the reaction solution was taken out from the autoclave when the temperature was cooled back to the room temperature. The measurement according to the process described above revealed that the conversion of methylhydroquinone was 86% by mole, the selectivity of dimethylhydroquinone was 38% by mole, the selectivity of trimethylhydroquinone was 37% by mole and no tetramethylhydroquinone was produced. As byproducts, methyl ethers of monomethylhydroquinone, dimethylhydroquinone and trimethylhydroquinone, represented by the formulae shown above, were formed with a selectivity of 6%, 4% and 3%, respectively. equipped with a manometer) up to 350° C. the autoclave was quickly cooled
Source ID: ord-2f89a487dff242c6bbc0ea7b9ebf3e32PubChem References
These sources are listed in the compound's public database record.
Related Products
12 related records
CAS 620-24-6
CAS 1706-11-2
CAS 7768-28-7
CAS 33104-32-4
CAS 2432-11-3
CAS 24599-58-4
CAS 309752-65-6
CAS 527-35-5
CAS 2233-18-3
CAS 529-35-1
CAS 1687-65-6
CAS 35946-91-9
Request a Quote
Send the required specification, quantity, destination and intended use. The CATO team will review availability and respond.
