2,3-dihydroxypropyl dodecanoate

Conditions: temp:0.00; pressure:0.00; stir:; See reaction.notes.procedure_details.

Procedure: Example 2A was repeated but for the sequence of addition of glycerol monolaurate and cetyl alcohol. Instead of being added in the second step, after the equimolar mixture of stearic acid and DDAC, the same amount of the glycerol monolaurate and cetyl alcohol added in Example 2 was added after the addition of TEA. Instead of being added in the second step was added after the addition of TEA

Conditions: temp:0.00; pressure:0.00; stir:; See reaction.notes.procedure_details.

Procedure: Example 2 was repeated but for the sequence of addition of glycerol monolaurate. Instead of being added with cetyl alcohol, an equal amount of glycerol monolaurate utilized in Example 2 was added after the addition of the TEA. was added

Conditions: temp:0.00; pressure:0.00; stir:; See reaction.notes.procedure_details.

Procedure: Example 2A was repeated but for the sequence of addition of glycerol monolaurate and cetyl alcohol. Instead of being added in the second step, after the equimolar mixture of stearic acid and DDAC, the same amount of the glycerol monolaurate and cetyl alcohol added in Example 2 was added after the addition of TEA. Instead of being added in the second step was added after the addition of TEA

Conditions: temp:0.00; pressure:0.00; stir:; See reaction.notes.procedure_details.

Procedure: Example 2 was repeated but for the sequence of addition of glycerol monolaurate. Instead of being added with cetyl alcohol, an equal amount of glycerol monolaurate utilized in Example 2 was added after the addition of the TEA. was added

Conditions: temp:0.00; pressure:0.00; stir:; See reaction.notes.procedure_details.

Procedure: Example 2A was repeated but for the sequence of addition of glycerol monolaurate and cetyl alcohol. Instead of being added in the second step, after the equimolar mixture of stearic acid and DDAC, the same amount of the glycerol monolaurate and cetyl alcohol added in Example 2 was added after the addition of TEA. Instead of being added in the second step was added after the addition of TEA

Conditions: temp:0.00; pressure:0.00; stir:; See reaction.notes.procedure_details.

Procedure: Example 2 was repeated but for the sequence of addition of glycerol monolaurate. Instead of being added with cetyl alcohol, an equal amount of glycerol monolaurate utilized in Example 2 was added after the addition of the TEA. was added

Conditions: temp:0.00; pressure:0.00; stir:; See reaction.notes.procedure_details.

Procedure: Example 2A was repeated but for the sequence of addition of glycerol monolaurate and cetyl alcohol. Instead of being added in the second step, after the equimolar mixture of stearic acid and DDAC, the same amount of the glycerol monolaurate and cetyl alcohol added in Example 2 was added after the addition of TEA. Instead of being added in the second step was added after the addition of TEA

Conditions: temp:0.00; pressure:0.00; stir:; See reaction.notes.procedure_details.

Procedure: Example 2 was repeated but for the sequence of addition of glycerol monolaurate. Instead of being added with cetyl alcohol, an equal amount of glycerol monolaurate utilized in Example 2 was added after the addition of the TEA. was added

Conditions: temp:0.00; pressure:0.00; stir:; See reaction.notes.procedure_details.

Procedure: A fluid solution of 20.0% Lauricidin, 10.0% salicylic acid, and 10.0% DOSS surfactant in isopropanol was prepared by stirring the mixture until the Lauricidin was dissolved. 20% of the fluid solution was combined with 80% of the hardcoat mixture described in Examples 1-11 (i.e., 100 parts of 3M 906 Hardcoat with 12 parts toluene and 12 parts methyl ethyl ketone). The combined solution was coated and cured as described in Examples 1-11. The resulting multi-layer film was clear and transparent. The resulting multi-layer film was then tested for microbial load reduction, as described above in Examples 1-11, and gave 100% microbial load reduction for gram positive pathogens and 99.4% microbial load reduction for gram negative pathogens. was dissolved gave 100% microbial load reduction for gram positive pathogens and 99.4% microbial load reduction for gram negative pathogens

Conditions: temp:0.00; pressure:0.00; stir:; See reaction.notes.procedure_details.

Procedure: Example 2A was repeated but for the sequence of addition of glycerol monolaurate and cetyl alcohol. Instead of being added in the second step, after the equimolar mixture of stearic acid and DDAC, the same amount of the glycerol monolaurate and cetyl alcohol added in Example 2 was added after the addition of TEA. Instead of being added in the second step was added after the addition of TEA

Conditions: temp:0.00; pressure:0.00; stir:; See reaction.notes.procedure_details.

Procedure: Example 2 was repeated but for the sequence of addition of glycerol monolaurate. Instead of being added with cetyl alcohol, an equal amount of glycerol monolaurate utilized in Example 2 was added after the addition of the TEA. was added

Conditions: temp:0.00; pressure:0.00; stir:; See reaction.notes.procedure_details.

Procedure: Example 2A was repeated but for the sequence of addition of glycerol monolaurate and cetyl alcohol. Instead of being added in the second step, after the equimolar mixture of stearic acid and DDAC, the same amount of the glycerol monolaurate and cetyl alcohol added in Example 2 was added after the addition of TEA. Instead of being added in the second step was added after the addition of TEA